Writing for the attention span
Is my story short enough?
I've just started to write a story. Not this one. A fiction.
I am often contemplating now why I write on Vocal: do I have a message? Sometimes. Is it for the joy? Always. Is it for engagement? Maybe, depending on what form that engagement takes.
I know for sure that I want people to read what I write and I want it to be because they want to.
When I started writing my aforementioned fiction piece, I halted mid-sentence to write this. It's probably not the best move. I'm on my own in the house and I have some rare "quiet time" where I might just be able to type something fictional uninterrupted. I've come back in from a walk and the germ of a story entered my mind whilst pacing the pavement, the opening sentence worming its way in as I approached the front door and I wanted to, nay, was compelled to, write it down.
As with most of my writing, the next sentence came and so on and so forth until a couple of paragraphs are sitting as a draft and have emerged as the start of a new tale. However, it's not a flash fiction; it's not a drabble. It's going to be a story, a few pages maybe, but not a really short one and it got me thinking:
Is it going to be too long? Should I write it for the attention span?
You see, I do write for myself but I'd be lying if I said that I don't want others to read my work: I do.
But are we tuned out of reading longer stories and should I allow for that in order to get it read?
Is there a compromise to be made between what your audience want and what you want to deliver? Art or artifice? And by that I mean, should I just write content that I think will get read or should I write according to my own artistic vision?
I know. It sounds pretentious. I don't consider myself an artist by any means but I do create and they are original pieces so I am at least some sort of craftsperson. A writer. A wordsmith. A weaver of tales.
So, should I just write shorter stuff that gets a 3 minute tag so that someone picks it up and potentially reads it?
I don't know is the truthful answer.
I know that there are great writers on this platform but I don't always read everything that they create because I just can't. Do I read out of some loyalty? If I'm honest, yes, I do. That is a driver for me, to be supportive and I am loyal too. I try to be there for others because others matter. However, I know that I can't read it all and so, I might cherry pick shorter pieces that I know I can devote time to. I don't skim them as I would a longer piece maybe.
Knowing this about myself makes me reflect on the reading experience of others. I think we'd all like to believe that with our first sentence we've snagged the reader and they feel compelled to read on but I'm not kidding myself that I'm a Booker Prize winner here. What I write, poetry or articles or reviews, aren't bad and I genuinely think some of my stories are good. (As an aside, I like to reread my work, come back to it after some time away, to view it with fresh eyes. I discussed this a little in a piece about not deleting your drafts - link at end - but I do actually like to read my own completed stories too. Fact.)
Some of you will remember my year of writing a story every day along with some others. I had a lot of support that year, like a marathon crew and I am grateful for the interaction I had.
I don't want you to think that I'm bleating about lack of engagement either although it feels like this is degenerating into that...it is not the purpose of writing this.
What I am wondering is if, in order to get engagement on Vocal, it's best to keep it short. If you do stray longer than, say, the 600 word minimum, are you at risk of turning readers off before they've even got going?
And it gets me to thinking: is this an attention span thing?
We live in a world of instant gratification - is it just too hard to devote the time? Is it too much to sit and read a longer piece when there are so many other demands on our time? Are we addicted to the quick fix, the "hit me and move on" approach?
I'd love to know your thoughts on this. For me, I'm going to write the longer story, time permitting, and publish, because I want those characters to be formed fully and the story will have a message that I want to state and explore completely. I don't want to be thinking about limits; I just want to write it.
But the question is, once it's complete, will anyone read it apart from me?
***
My piece on deleting drafts got a Top Story on here and you can read it here:


Comments (6)
I love it when you write these pieces that explore your thought process of writing. Often I find my own emotions echoed in your words. I have literally pulled over on the side of the road because I found myself composing literary genius in my head while driving and knew it would vanish if I waited until I reached my destination. I remember your year of writing a story a day (did you ever finish that saga of Bethan?) and the effect that had on my own writing. I have always been long winded (in writing and speaking) and struggled to get readers on my early stories that neared the word count max. Reading your shorter pieces made me realize I could take my very long story about wind and split it into several shorter tales to engage my readers. That worked out very nicely for me. I have another saga I plan to start publishing that I have broken into several shorter pieces. Like you, I love to revisit my stories after a while apart and I'm always amazed at my own genius and dismayed at the lack of engagement on early pieces. I often consider going back to some and splitting them into shorter, more manageable installments. But sometimes the story needs to be longer and kept whole. And then I ask myself, who am I really writing this for? Truth be told, I'm writing it for my legacy. I've had to face my own mortality in recent years and when I leave this world (hopefully many years from now) I want there to be a piece of me left behind.
You have touched on so many topics with this article. I noticed a long time ago that writing a long story for Vocal readers is a waste of time. People on this platform are looking for a quick story and then move on. That's why I write books and short stories. A perfect example of trends is my novel at the local library has been checked out 5 times, while my short story book has been checked out 11.
Shorter pieces definitely get more traffic. Sometimes I feel like I’m screaming into the abyss.
I absolutely think the shorter stories on here get more eyeballs, including from the vocal higher-ups. I know I fall prey to that need for brevity because of all the things screaming for my attention.
You writing certainly get my attention. As for me some of my stories have a mind of its own when there is no mental block. Sorry , I miss your Top Story. I will check it out now
Well-wrought, and a timely question, I think. I see a society which is starting to get burnt out on quick fixes (which is what quick fixes tend to do) and I think we're in for a turn back to deeper strata of meaning, and the one demographic who will likely lean into that first and most are readers and writers. I would never discourage you from publishing anything anywhere. Might I suggest, however, that you submit some of your longer pieces to lit mags out there? Send 'em out on "the carousel" and if they come back round to you, you can always still publish them here! Your work is consistently excellent. It could be accepted anywhere, though there is, of course, no accounting for taste!